Canonical: https://dokima.net/compare/
Updated: 2026-11-04T23:30:51+00:00

Compare approaches

# Different security tools do different jobs.

Dokima does not make every other review method obsolete. These guides explain where each approach works well, where Dokima differs and when they belong together.

[01Dokima vs Prompting Claude or writing a skillA prompt or skill is one pass that may or may not catch something. Dokima keeps reviewing, remembers what it found and shows what it has covered.**→**](https://dokima.net/compare/claude-prompts-and-skills/)[02Dokima vs Conventional SASTFast rule-based scanning and a contextual AI review solve different parts of the problem.**→**](https://dokima.net/compare/sast/)[03Dokima vs Pull-request review botsPR feedback is useful at the change. Dokima keeps the wider codebase and report lifecycle in view.**→**](https://dokima.net/compare/pull-request-review/)[04Dokima vs Periodic security assessmentsExpert point-in-time depth and continuous source review can complement one another.**→**](https://dokima.net/compare/security-assessments/)[05Dokima vs General-purpose AI audit agentsOne-off AI analysis is flexible. Dokima adds repeatable stages, persistent state and finding governance.**→**](https://dokima.net/compare/ai-audit-agents/)

How these pages are written**Category comparisons, not invented scorecards.**

Capabilities vary between products and change over time. These pages compare broad approaches without claiming that every tool in a category behaves the same way.

See what Dokima finds

## Put an AI security reviewer to work on your codebase.

Start a full-product 21-day trial for your engineering team. No payment card required.

[Start free trial](https://dokima.net/account/?view=register)[Buy Dokima](https://dokima.net/buy/)[View sample report →](https://dokima.net/sample-report/)