Who Dokima suits
Dokima vs pull-request review bots
A pull request shows the change. The security question may live elsewhere.
PR review bots meet developers at a useful moment. Dokima works across the wider workspace, keeps security context between runs and maintains findings beyond a single code review.
Where it works well
Pull-request review bots has a useful job to do.
- Giving immediate feedback where developers already review changes.
- Catching local mistakes before merge.
- Explaining or summarising a compact code change.
- Keeping routine review comments close to the pull request.
Where Dokima differs
Context and review, not just another pass.
- 01Dokima can review existing code, not only the current diff.
- 02Architecture, attack-surface and security-assumption state persists across the workspace.
- 03Work is scheduled by review stage instead of being limited to the PR event.
- 04Findings remain in a dedicated security lifecycle after the change is merged.
Capability comparison
CapabilityDokimaPull-request review bots
Review scopeRepositories, components and scheduled workThe current pull request or changed lines
TimingInitial review plus continued scheduled passesWhen a pull request is opened or updated
Persistent contextStored architecture, assumptions and finding stateVaries by product; often PR-centred
Finding lifecycleChallenge, validate, deduplicate, report and annotateComment, suggestion or PR status
Developer experienceDashboard and HTML security reportFeedback inside code review
Use them together
Let the bot handle timely PR feedback. Use Dokima to maintain whole-codebase context and a reviewed security finding record.
See what Dokima finds
Put an AI security reviewer to work on your codebase.
Request a full-product trial for your engineering team. No payment card required.