Who Dokima suits
Dokima vs periodic security assessments
A good assessment goes deep. Dokima helps you keep reviewing between them.
Specialist assessments bring expert judgment, conversation and a deliberately scoped point-in-time view. Dokima gives the engineering team a repeatable source-review process as the codebase continues to change.
Where it works well
Periodic security assessments has a useful job to do.
- Bringing experienced human judgment to a defined business problem.
- Reviewing wider organisational, deployment and process context.
- Testing assumptions through direct discussion with the team.
- Providing independent assurance at an important point in time.
Where Dokima differs
Context and review, not just another pass.
- 01Dokima can be run repeatedly without booking a new engagement.
- 02Its codebase context and finding state stay with the workspace.
- 03Engineering teams can schedule architecture, hunting and finding-review work themselves.
- 04The scope is defensive source review; Dokima does not claim to replace broader assurance.
Capability comparison
CapabilityDokimaPeriodic security assessments
Review modelSoftware-led, repeatable source workflowTime-bounded expert engagement
CadenceInitial review and continued scheduled workPeriodic or event-driven
Human judgmentDeveloper review and configurable human decisionsDirect specialist judgment and discussion
ScopeSource repositories in the configured workspaceAgreed scope; may include broader systems and processes
OutputLiving local report and finding stateAssessment report, presentation and remediation advice
Use them together
Use Dokima between assessments, prepare better context for the specialist and keep reviewing the code after the point-in-time report.
See what Dokima finds
Put an AI security reviewer to work on your codebase.
Request a full-product trial for your engineering team. No payment card required.